Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2015, 3(2), 43-60
DOI: 10.24411/2310-2144-2015-00003
Astronomical interpretation of the signs on the vessel of the Bronze Age (Central Donbass)
Larisa N. Vodolazhskaya1*, Anatoliy N. Usachuk2, Mikhail Yu. Nevsky3
1Southern Federal University (SFU), str. Zorge, 5, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, Russian Federation; E-mails: larisavodol@aaatec.org, larisavodol@gmail.com
2Donetsk Regional Museum, Donetsk, Ukraine; E-Mail: doold@mail.ru
3Southern Federal University (SFU), str. Zorge, 5, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, Russian Federation; E-mails: mnevsk@gmail.com, munevsky@sfedu.ru
Abstract
The article presents the results of multidisciplinary study carried out with the help of archaeological and astronomical methods. The aim of the study was to analyze and interpret the signs - elements of the composition, incised on the outer side surface of the vessel of the Late Bronze Age, owned to Srubna culture and discovered near the Staropetrovsky village in the northeast of the Donetsk region. The measurements and astronomical calculations revealed that all signs have astronomical meaning. Fourray star has been interpreted as the star Sirius. The sign polyline has been interpreted as an analog of graphic of equation of time in which the testimony of a water clock correspond with average solar time, and the testimony of a sundial - the true solar time. Sign wheel has been interpreted as a complex of lines, reflecting the regularity changing the direction of the shadows from the gnomon at sunset at the equinoxes and solstices. The sign thin polyline has been interpreted as a symbol of change of height of the Sun in the meridian at the equinoxes and solstices. Interpretation of wheel and polyline is related to the definition of the duration of the day. Sign of the wheel shows a direct relationship the duration of the day on the magnitude of the azimuth of sunrise/sunset, and thin polyline - from changing the height of the Sun in the meridian. Thus Staropetrovsky vessel, thanks to the astronomical signs, is a kind of ancient astronomical visual aid, which reflects the level of astronomical knowledge of the priesthood of Srubna culture at the late Bronze Age.
Keywords: archaeoastronomy, vessel, Srubna culture, marks, Sirius, equation of time, mean solar time, true solar time, azimuth, calendar, astronomical year.
Full Text: Download pdf (English)
References
1. Klimenko, V.F.; Usachuk, A.N.; Tsymbal V.I. Kurgannye drevnosti Central'nogo Donbassa. [Ancient mounds of the Central Donbass]. Donetsk: RIP "Lebed", 1994, 127 p.
2. Klimenko, V.F.; Tsymbal V.I. O sosudax so znakami srubnoj obshhnosti e'poxi pozdnej bronzy v Severo-Vostochnom Priazov'e i Podoncov'e. [On vessels with signs carcass generality of the Late Bronze Age in the North East and the Sea of Azov Podontsove]. DAS. Vol. 10. Donetsk: Donetsk National University Publishing House, 2002, p. 33.
3. Zakharova, E.Yu. Sosudy so znakami srubnoj obshhnosti e'poxi pozdnej bronzy. [Vessels with signs carcass generality of the Late Bronze Age]. Voronezh: TSCHKI, 2000, 163 p.
4. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Vodolazhsky, D.I.; Ilyukov, L.S. Metodika komp'yuternoj fiksacii graficheskogo materiala arxeologicheskix raskopok na primere Karataevskoj kreposti. [Technique of of computer fixing graphic material of archaeological excavations on the example Karataevo fortress]. Informacionnyj byulleten' Associacii Istoriya i komp'yuter. [Association Newsletter History and Computer], 2003, No 31, pp. 248-258
5. Vodolazhskaya L. Reconstruction of Heron's formulas for calculating the volume of vessels, in Posluschny, Axel; Lambers, Karsten; Herzog, Imela, Layers of Perception. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, April 2-6, 2007, Kolloquien zur Vor- und Fruhgeschichte, Bd. 10, Berlin: Habelt; Propylaeum-DOC, 2008. - P. 1-7.
6. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Ponomarenko, V.O. Ximicheskij sostav keramiki svetloglinyanyx uzkogorlyx amfor varianta D tipa C IV iz Tanaisa. [The chemical composition of the ceramic svetloglinyanyh narrow-necked amphorae type D variant of the C IV Tanais]. Trudy III (XIX) Vserossijskogo arxeologicheskogo s"ezda. [Proceedings of III (XIX) All-Russian Archaeological Congress]. Veliky Novgorod - Staraya Russa. T. I St. Petersburg, Moscow, Novgorod the Great: 2011, 307-308.
7. Ponomarenko, V.O.; Sarychev, D.; Vodolazhskaya, L.N. Primenenie rentgenofluorescentnogo analiza dlya issledovaniya ximicheskogo sostava amfornoj keramiki. [The use of X-ray fluorescence analysis for the study of the chemical composition amphorae ceramic]. Vestnik Yuzhnogo Nauchnogo Centra RAN. [Bulletin of the Southern Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2012, vol. 8, No 1, pp. 9-17
8. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Nevsky, M.Yu. Arxeoastronomicheskie issledovaniya svyatilishha Karataevo-Livencovskogo kompleksa. [Arhaeoastronomical research sanctuary Karataevo-Liventsovsky complex]. Metodika issledovaniya kul'tovyx kompleksov. [Technique of study of religious complexes]. Barnaul: OOO Pyat' plyus, 2012, pp. 5-13.
9. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Larenok, V.A. Arhaeoastronomical analysis of Levinsadovka sacrificial complex (South Russia). Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2013, 1(1), 5-25.
10. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Nevsky, M.Yu. Russian meteorite of the Bronze Age (rock record). Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2013, 1(2), 18-32.
11. Vodolazhskaya, L.N. Reconstruction of ancient Egyptian sundials. Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2014, 2(2), 1-18.
12. Vodolazhskaya, L.N. Analemmatic and horizontal sundials of the Bronze Age (Northern Black Sea Coast). Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2013, 1(1), 68-88.
13. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Usachuk, A.N.; Nevsky, M.Yu. Clepsydra of the Bronze Age from the Central Donbass. Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2015, 3(1), 65-87.
14. Vodolazhskaya, L.N.; Usachuk, A.N.; Nevsky, M.Yu. Marks of heliacal rising of Sirius on the sundial of the Bronze Age. Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2015, 3(2), 23-42.
15. Kononovich, E.V.; Moroz, V.I. Obshhij kurs astronomii. [The general course of astronomy]. M .: Editorial, 2004, 544 p.
16. Leverington D. Babylon to Voyager and beyond: a history of planetary astronomy. Cambridge University Press, 2003. - P. 6-7.
17. Evans J. The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy, Oxford University Press. 1998. - PP. 213-215.
18. Toomer G.J. Ptolemy's Almagest. Princeton University Press. 1998. - P. 171.
19. Kelley, D.; Milone, E. Exploring Ancient Skies: An Encyclopedic Survey of Archaeoastronomy. New York: Springer-NY, 2005. - P. 21.
20. Potemkina, T. M.; Yurevich, V. A. Iz opyta arxeoastronomicheskogo issledovaniya arxeologicheskix pamyatnikov (metodicheskij aspekt). [From the experience of archaeoastronomical studies of archaeological sites (methodological aspect)]. M.: IA RAN, 1998, p. 21
21. Abalakin, V.K. Astronomicheskij kalendar'. Postoyannaya chast'. [Astronomical calendar. Permanent part]. M.: Nauka, 1981, p. 44.
22. Montenbruk, O.; Pfleger, T. Astronomiya na personal'nom komp'yutere. [Astronomy on the personal computer]. SPb.: Piter, 2002, p. 33.
